Glossary

Comparative negligence

A fault rule that reduces an injured person's recovery by their own share of blame for a crash, instead of barring recovery entirely.

Also called: comparative fault, pure comparative negligence, modified comparative negligence

Comparative negligence is the rule most states use to divide responsibility when more than one driver contributed to a crash. Each party is assigned a percentage of fault, and an injured person's damages are reduced by their own percentage. It replaced the older, harsher contributory negligence rule in most of the country.

There are two main versions. Under pure comparative negligence, you can recover something even if you were mostly at fault: with $50,000 in damages and 70% of the fault, you can recover $15,000. California and New York follow this approach. Under modified comparative negligence, you recover nothing once your share of fault reaches a bar, set at 50% or 51% depending on the state. Florida moved from pure to modified comparative negligence in 2023, so a Florida claimant found more than 50% at fault now recovers nothing.

Insurers apply the same logic when they negotiate claims, assigning fault percentages and reducing payments to match, which is why the evidence you collect at the scene matters. An insurer's fault decision is related to, but not the same as, a court's finding of negligence. For a dispute over a serious injury, a licensed attorney can explain how your state's rule applies. See comparative vs contributory negligence.

Last reviewed October 4, 2026

In the index now

Related terms

Related guides